Rss Feed

Press Release, Carlijn Simons (in Dutch)


I am pleased to share with you that in regard to my Imagineering company/city Naarden-Vesting a press release has been published. Furthermore, the municipality is printing 100 copies of my thesis to further inform their collegues and the inhabitants about the plans for the future of their city.
Regards,
Carlijn Simons
Almere, 11 november 2010

Bedrijfsleven Naarden-Vesting neemt heft in eigen hand en start ondernemersvereniging

Almere, 11 november 2010 – Ondernemers in Naarden-Vesting hebben zelf het initiatief genomen een ondernemersvereniging op te richten. In samenwerking met de gemeente Naarden en de Kamer van Koophandel Gooi-, Eem- en Flevoland zijn de ondernemers gekomen tot een gezamenlijk belang en een gedeelde visie binnen Naarden-Vesting. Met deze gezamenlijke en gedeelde visie is het mogelijk om aan de toekomst van een ondernemende vestingstad te werken en de belangen van ondernemers goed te behartigen. Dit is de uitkomst van een rapport dat gisteren officieel werd overhandigd aan Frans van Vugt, wethouder Economische Zaken van de gemeente Naarden en Mariëlle Baars-Wielandt, adviseur regionale economie van de Kamer van Koophandel Gooi-, Eem- en Flevoland. 

Carlijn Simons heeft in het kader van haar studie Imagineering aan de NHTV in Breda deze rapportage opgesteld, welke mede mogelijk is gemaakt door de gemeente Naarden en de Kamer van Koophandel Gooi-, Eem- en Flevoland. Doel van de opdracht was om ondernemers in Naarden-Vesting en inwoners van de vestingstad op basis van co-creatie te laten werken aan een gezamenlijke visie en voor de ondernemers een vaste gesprekspartner voor de gemeente te vormen. Uiteindelijk hebben in diverse sessies ondernemers aangegeven hoe zij de situatie in de Vesting zien en waar zij in de toekomst heen willen. Hieruit is al meteen het initiatief voor een ondernemersvereniging gekomen waarin de belangen van ondernemers geborgd kunnen worden. Marije van Proosdij-Verfürden van Coffee Culture is groot voorstander van een ondernemersvereniging en heeft het voortouw genomen in de totstandkoming. 

Georganiseerd platform
“Het is echt tijd voor een collectieve aanpak in Naarden-Vesting. Dat blijkt ook uit de vele enthousiaste reacties die we hebben ontvangen. Het belang van een georganiseerd platform voor ondernemers op het gebied van bijvoorbeeld Public Relations, of parkeerbeleid blijkt hiermee onderscheven te worden. Samenwerking tussen en afstemming met ondernemers zorgt ervoor dat de ondernemersvereniging in oprichting een goede gesprekspartner is voor onder andere de gemeente”, aldus Van Proosdij-Verfürden. Maandag 22 november worden de korte termijndoelstellingen, de begroting en het bestuur van de ondernemersvereniging in de Grote Kerk in Naarden gepresenteerd. 

Over de Kamer van Koophandel Gooi-, Eem- en Flevoland
Doel van de Kamer van Koophandel Gooi-, Eem- en Flevoland is alle ondernemers verder laten komen met ondernemen. Dit doet de KvK onder andere door het aanbieden van diverse seminars, landelijke themadagen, maar ook door advies te geven over de regionale economie en ondernemers te stimuleren zich te verenigingen. Het faciliteren van een onderzoek als dit en de bijeenkomsten om te komen tot een gezamenlijke visie in Naarden Vesting is hier een voorbeeld van. 
Over de gemeente NaardenDe gemeente Naarden waardeert het initiatief van de ondernemers om tot een gezamenlijke visie te komen; een visie op het (nog) beter benutten van de potentie van de Vesting. De gemeente is blij met de oprichting van een ondernemersvereniging. De gemeente verwacht dat een vaste gesprekspartner namens de ondernemers een goede basis vormt voor constructieve samenwerking en ondersteuning. 

Greenpeace - Nestle, Orang-Utan and Palm Oil

Movie of Kishore's Book review

NECESSARY REVOLUTION


Book Reviewer: Kishore Menon
BOOK : NECESSARY ROVOLUTION
SUB TITLE : How individuals and organisations are working together to create a sustainable world

AUTHORS : Peter Senge, Bryan Smith, Nina Kruschwitz, Joe Laur, Sara Schley
REMARK : Must read, If you want to see the big picture and interests in “Systems Thinking”
Peter Senge, Senior lecture at MIT Sloan School of management and founder of Society for Organisational Learning (SoL ), author of The Fifth Discipline, honoured as one of the seminal management books of the past  75 years by Harvard Business Review.


and this is the outcome.

Nike has reduced its “carbon foot print“ by more than 75 percent. This was not enforced upon them by any regulatory authorities. Looking for the truly innovative opportunities for the future, company declared to achieve zero waste, zero toxicity, and 100 percent recyclability across its entire product range by 2020.

Why ?
Industrial age bubble – “ Take – Make – Waste “, way of thinking which dominated the world for the last 200 years is coming to an end.
Climate change, natural resource crunch, rampant consumerism, widening economic divide are some of the social and environmental challenge which lies ahead of us, which also gives us the opportunity to change, for good. Transformative collaboration happening between businesses, governments, non- profit organisations are starting to bring about real, sustainable change.
We need to stop pretending that the problem belongs to someone else. In the interconnected world there is no good or bad guys, we are all responsible for our core sustainable issues food, water, energy, waste etc and we all have be part of the solution.
This is the necessary revolution, which needs a shift in thinking.
Industrial age has been an era earmarked by harvesting of natural and social capital to produce physical and financial capital and the time has come when we have to reverse that process. If you look at the complete value chain, it takes 200 litres of water resources to produce 1 litre of Coke, which is way beyond the reduction they were looking to bring down from 3 litres to 2.5 litres, utilised within the factory.  Enterprises no more can limit itself to think outside the box, but need to look outside and beyond the building.

Within the industrial bubble we had to choose between better standard of living or healthy ecosystem and cannot have both. In a life beyond the bubble, it’s illogical to assume that our answers from the past are automatically the answers for the future. Innovation Leaders recognising this fact are implementing revolutionary and not just incremental changes in the way we live and work.

To create a sustainable world, inspiration should be drawn not from the machines but from nature and the creation of a different future is only possible by learning to see the larger systems of which they we are part of and fostering collaboration across every imaginable boundary. Market based forces are much more powerful than legal or governmental action in spurring innovation and genuine commitment. So it’s about how one help people simultaneously to be effective in dealing with the reality they face and yet have an orientation towards where they want to go. In a regenerative economy we need to learn to see the larger systems in which we live and work, hence systems thinking.
With living examples cited from major corporations like GE, Toyota, Alcoa, DuPont, Coca-Cola, Costco, Nike, BP and many more, the book stresses upon the power of understanding the mental models and generative conversation.

This book carries simple and logical pictorial depiction of an alternative industrial system. Here they talk about a regenerative circular economy wherein separate circular flow of technical and biological nutrients mimics the living-systems principle of “waste = food“, which has two critical benefits : reduction in waste flows and their damage to natural systems and reduction in the amount of natural resources that must be extracted.

Tomorrow is not far, when we will have buildings that produce more energy and clean water than they can use and function more like trees and forests. The book has specific tools and a way of thinking to help us build competence to respond to the greater challenges of our times. If one gets to see though the content with regard to management models of those successful collaborations, one can see that the predominant pattern that would emerge is that of relational in nature rather than command and control model.

Since my BTR deals with subjects like “ Systems Thinking ” and sustainability this book gave me the big picture framework with regard both the subjects of interest and how some major corporations are transforming themselves to meet these challenges.
The book also helped me with lot of insights, which was thought provoking enough to enable me to find new dimensions in my search for concepts and widening the possibilities within the scope of the project and BTR.

Innovation can never be predicted in advance and can seem impossibly daunting, they are often catalyzed by small number of people who can both see large patterns and focus on small steps that build momentum. Along with organisational intelligence, if you can tap into emotional and intellectual intelligence of individuals in an organisation, unleashing their latent collective imagination and energy within and among them, one can consider the battle as, won.

Do you have it in you ?

Kishore 



Book Review on 'Leadership That Matters '


Book Review on 'Leadership That Matters '

The book I am presenting is called ‘Leadership That Matters’ and was written in 2003 by Marshall Sashkin & Molly G. Sashkin. As the title already suggests, it brings leadership closer to the reader, bringing one special kind of leadership to the fore: Transformational Leadership. As the authors emphasize, in the 21st century there is more to being a leader than just improving productivity and performance – leaders who matter have the ability to transform their organizational members from dutiful followers into self-directed leaders – they facilitate change rather than exercising it themselves. Same as we Imagineers do…

Sashkin & Sashkin conducted a lot of research on leadership approaches. In total they took out seven approaches that had common elements and synthesized those into their own approach: Leadership That Matters. The three most important parts of this approach are:
1. the leader’s personality (characteristics),
2. his/her behavior and
3. the situational context of leadership (organizational context or culture).
The book is divided into thirteen chapters which logically build upon each other. Though, it is not always as easy to read because of constant repetitions which cause confusion from time to time. Anyway, the following lines will hopefully give you an insight into the book’s main thoughts.

What is it, leadership?
The first two chapters build the introduction which depicts the ‘puzzle’ of leadership which is put together by several approaches. According to the Sashkins, many of those definitions contain essential elements, but after all they miss the combination of the most important ones in order to describe leadership correctly. That’s what the Sashkins thus did and called it Leadership That Matters.
Already in the beginning they make an important differentiation between ‘leaders’ and ‘managers’: leadership (in contrast to management) does not only imply the usual job definition, it also explains WHY the job is being done – it goes beyond the obvious. Transformational leaders (in addition to managers) ‘develop a compact between themselves and their followers’ (p.37). They create meaning for both parties, their leadership thus matters. Translating this idea into Imagineering terms, transformational leadership facilitates symbolic value co-creation which results in individual transformation.
A term that is introduced here is also already known from Imagineering: the ‘paradigm’ of Thomas Kuhn. Though, in the area of leadership, James McGregor Burns was the introducing person of the new leadership paradigm. In order to understand the new things, the old have to be set into perspective. Sashkin and Sashkin hereby make the difference between transactional (trading) and transformational (bonding) leadership. The authors also refer to examples out of history, like Gandhi as best example of transformational leader.


Leadership Skills and Behaviors
After having conducted some research about the behaviors and skills used by transformational leaders, Sashkin and Sashkin came up with their own definition of the most important behaviors:
• skilled communication
• trust-building
• expression of care and respect for others and
• creating empowerment opportunities.
These behaviors are merely the result of transformational leadership, not its cause or source. Additionally, they can only be applied effectively when a leaders possesses the personal characteristics summarized as ABC (affect/emotions, behavioral intent/confidence to act and cognitive capability/basis for shared vision) that are discussed in the following chapters.

What else does it take to call someone a leader?
The authors argue that just focusing on behaviors does not lead to effective conclusions about leadership, there has to be more. So they go over to their second element, characteristics.
In this context they mention the research from Robert House, who brought in a new important aspect of transformational leadership when stating that leadership had something to do with the character of the leader (‘charismatic leadership’). However, the authors argument that charisma and behavioral skills alone do not define effective leadership. They even argue that charismatic leadership has to be separated from transformational leadership because it can be dangerous when being used in a manipulative way. What is important here is that both forms have the same basic source: the leader’s need for power and control. So the need for power is an essential part of the leader’s character, but is also important for the follower as a guideline.
Another important aspect for influencing followers is the leader’s self-confidence. The authors use an example of actor Will Smith, who was building a wall in order to extend the father’s shop space. Will thought he and his brother would not make it, it took them ages to finish. When it was done, their father told them “Never believe that there’s anything you can’t do!” (p.85). Here they also mention the principle of self-fulfilling principle, referring to the belief that you can do something is often enough to encourage you to try. Transformational leaders encourage their followers, as will be stated later. Empowering people is set into perspective with taking risks and control from the leader’s side, and relates to the degree of self-confidence. The more control the leader wants to keep, the less self-confidence he has and the higher the risk he runs to be a bad leader because the resources and the trust that are necessary for the follower are not provided. Control and self-confidence are thus two of the three important characteristics a transformational leader should have. In addition, the way of empowering people is summarized in the ‘vision’ which is the cognitive capability of leadership approaches. Sashkin and Sashkin do not agree with usual definitions of vision, such as ‘an image of an ideal future condition’ – they state that the future is a place that is created. The activity of making the paths to it changes both the maker and the destination.
Here we find back the co-creational part of making meaning, as it is done in Imagineering.
The personal characteristics are not necessarily inborn traits but can be developed. “If you do not have the skills, learn and practice them.” (p.108)

Culture is the key
The third and last element they discuss is the situational context, or as they call it as well, the culture. Culture is the key to organizational functioning. As the authors state, there are four key functions that create organizational context:
• Change (dealing with things outside the organization to attain goals)
• Goals (produce outcomes/achieve goals)
• Culture (define and support values and beliefs)
• Teamwork (coordinating the ongoing work of individuals and groups).



The Leadership Profile (TLP) as Measuring Instrument
The entire book is set up in a way that one can understand this kind of leadership better, but also practice it for own use by means of self-assessment materials spread over the chapters. The very key element of this book is the TLP which is an instrument that measures transactional and transformational leadership. It is a complete leadership model including 10 dimensions that are differentiated again in 50 specific behaviors. Taking the survey takes approximately 15 minutes – not only leaders assess themselves, but some of the ‘observers’ (usually 5) do the same test in order to compare results. The TLP is a 360-degree-measuring instrument and contains the 5-point Likert-type scale, answers are given in a range from 1-5.
The ten dimensions are listed below:

TRANSACTIONAL LEADERSHIP

1. Capable Management: This person makes sure people can have the resources they need to do a good job.

2. Reward Equity: This person recognizes good performance with rewards people value.

TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS

3. Communication Leadership: This person grabs people’s attention, focusing on the important issue in a discussion.

4. Credible Leadership: This person acts in ways consistent with his/her work.

5. Caring Leadership: This person respects people’s differences.

6. Creative Leadership: This person designs situations that permit people to achieve their goals.

TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP CHARACTERISTICS

7. Confident Leadership: This person makes a difference.

8. Follower-centered Leadership: This person seeks power and influence to attain goals people agree on.

9. Visionary Leadership: This person has plans that extend over a period of several years or longer.

10. Principled Leadership: This person encourages others to act according to the values ad beliefs we share.

Conclusion
As Sashkin and Sashkin already said at the end of their book, leadership is a management game. It is about communicating the right things to the right people and make the game work together. Several factors have influence and I think that the authors did a great job in synthesizng all academic information and made it their own. Though, sometimes it is hard to stay on track because they repeat a lot, which is exhausting when they summarize it differently all the time. Loss of information or lack of understanding follow easily.

Transformational Leadership vs Imagineering?
There is definitely no ‘vs’, for me both go hand in hand. I came across some elements that are related to Imagineering, or rather say that match the mindset of an Imagineer. I thought about Hostmanship as a connected approach to leadership that matters because it also rather invites people to co-create instead of delegating. A certain set of characteristics and behaviors are important here, as we also learned with identity marketing. Another statement that reminded me of our last block of Imagineering is ‘Leadership is about knowing how to follow.’ Shari Duron told a lot about leaders and followers, and that the best thing to do was being a follower once yourself in order to understand the expectations that are connected to the role of a follower. Appreciative thinking plays a big part here as well.
In general I liked the book and I think I can use it for my BTR because it comes along with new and refreshing insights about managing, leading and being inspirational in a way that matters.

Enjoy reading. Cheers,

Jenny

Linchpin: Are you Indispensable?




Linchpin: Are you Indispensable?

Seth Godin (Author)


“Every day I meet people who have so much to give but have been bullied enough or frightened enough to hold it back. It’s time to stop complying with the system and draw your own map. You have brilliance in you, your contribution is essential, and the art you create is precious. Only you can do it, and you must.” Seth Godin

Linchpins? That’s a term Seth Godin uses for anyone within an organization that makes himself indispensable, people that invent, lead, connect, figure out chaos and make things happen, no matter what their title or level in an organization is.

Introduction

Seth Godin is a well known Marketing guru, that I personally enjoy reading, famous for books such as the Purple Cow and All Marketers are Liars. In his books he talks about making remarkable products, products worth talking about and taking advantage of the connected world to engage with consumers. His approach on Marketing is in my opinion as close to Imagineering as it gets.

In his previous book, Tribes, he already takes a different direction from his pure Marketing books and writes about something different, it’s about the great opportunity that the connected world brings for anyone with the courage to lead, given the fact that a tribe is a group of people connected to each other by an idea, interest, belief or leader, it’s not that tribes are new in this world it’s just that today’s world brings the opportunity to connect to more people, faster, cheaper and easier than ever before. So this book is encouraging people to take on this opportunity to lead and challenge the idea that leading is just for CEO’s or celebrities or politicians. Not anymore.

I mention his previous book, because I think that whereas in Tribes his approach is on encouraging people to be brave enough to start their own enterprise in something they believe in, for Linchpin he focuses on employees, just remarkable people within organizations that can make a difference where they are.

The book?

For starters, I really appreciated the first chapters of the book in which he describes the New World, where we were, how we got here, changes in the economy and specially the implications for the world of Work.

The entire system we built our lives around tried to get the genius, the artistic nature, the creativity out of us. The Economy, the schools, all the great MBA´s wanted us to fit in, to think in a certain way or even to not think at all, if we could fit in, the system would take care of us.

We lived in a world built around factories (Old logic), factories that needed workers, the key to win in the old world was productivity, make the most you can with as little costs as you can, this meant that for it to work it needed low-paid, replaceable workers doing short-easy tasks, making automated decisions, people willing to trade their dreams and art and creativity for a weekly salary and stability. And it worked for a long time.

The problem is that this factory “system” is upside down, the economic crisis has hit hard and the deal is not working anymore, stability can’t be provided today. The old ways of fitting in with hard-work, with being on time, being discreet and quiet and not challenging managers with your own “crazy” ideas is no guarantee of stability, not anymore. The situation demands a new type of workers, people that can lead, communicate, make connections, create value, defy the status quo, artists. Today’s organizations require a different style of working (New Logic).

And this is where the Linchpins come in, the new deal requires employees that become irreplaceable, that put their personality, passion, art and soul into their work. Not only because it’s important for them but because companies need it, even if they don’t realize it.

The next “Big Idea” within a market will most likely come from outside the industry, by a small or even unknown company, with fresh and different ideas. And if within a company you limit your employees just to work and think in the way the CEO or the Directors think they are limiting their chances even more.

“Old Logic” Companies are struggling and strangely companies that embrace a new style of working are doing great, Apple, Google, Red Bull, Nintendo…

This book encourages people to take a stand, lose the fear, be willing to give up on the fake idea of stability, and start working with their own, personal roadmap.

Today’s world is a connected world, and a Linchpin has to be a “connected” individual, within their work unit or company but also outside, connections are key to make things happen, that’s why social skills are very important. In today’s world personality and attitude are sometimes even more important than the work itself.

Linchpins and Imagineering

It was very easy to see the connection, although the book is directed towards employees, giving them a push to work with more creativity, art, passion and joy, to become indispensable for a company by generating value, and in return getting the best jobs and more freedom to do it. As Imagineers we can use the elements in the book not necessarily to become Linchpins but to help design the new organizations in which Linchpins should be the essential building blocks.

We can refer to the theories we have studied about the “new” Leadership and Followership, and this one is a bit about both, it’s about creating value for yourself as well as the organization by being brave, smart and unique.

Linchpins are not Imagineers but I’d say that they are employees that embrace Imagineering within a company and that are not only unafraid but excited about change and new ways of working.

Loved the book, easy-reading, relevant and it really challenges people to become a part of change rather than fearing it. Insightful! A must-read for Imagineers!

Xavier Cortina

Implementation - the playground in practice

Dutch title: Implementeren: het speelveld in praktijk Authors: L. Pater, S. Roest, S. Dubbeldam & M. Verweijen Year: 2003 Publisher: Lemma BV, Utrecht

Change management traditionally refers to managing the roll-out of a changed strategy inside an organization and is a process which only starts after a senior management team have walked out of the boardroom with a clear-cut plan. At that point the new strategy is already determined and managers only have to figure out a way to roll it out and get people to join. Pater et al. (2003) speak of a 3x3 grid, that senior managers like to follow. First, they spend 3 weeks with the executive and leadership team, developing, building and shaping their strategy and plans. Then, they spend 3 days with middle management, discussing the new strategy and their ideas on how to align line management and push it out through the organization. Finally, they spend 3 hours with frontline staff, informing them on the new situation...

I found this video to illustrate what responses will follow this style of top-down strategy roll-out.


(Da Ali G Show, Channel 4)

Even though the presenter shows the audience how his invention works, lets them experience the benefits personally, and presents a revenue prediction, it is hard to imagine he will get any commitment at all. Now, however ridiculous the product and the marketing strategy might seem, the responses by his audience are typical for presentations like this.
Let me take you through the video again. The first person we see responding has a different notion of what is relevant (music instead of ice cream). Trying to understand the issue, he comes up with a solution he thinks is best. After the presenter tells him about his own idea, he says it “sounds like a good idea”, but walks off thinking the presenter has totally lost it. The woman we see a bit later responds to every phrase with “sure” and “alright”, but one can tell she is in fact not at all with him, and is not likely to buy in either. On top of this, the revenue calculation looks impressive, but is incomprehensible and does not convince any of the investors at the table.

Now, back to the book. Implementation, according to Pater et al. (2003), is the process of making a proposed change bring the intended result. It embodies the entire change process, starting from the first notion that something needs to change. This is where the book deviates from traditional discourse, since the desired change is not necessarily determined in advance. The essence of implementation is that changes are not only triggered, and not only represent the difference between the old and the new, but that the intended result is actually achieved. The proposed change in the organizational process has to really be used. It needs not only function, it needs to work. Implementing is about making it work.

The book offers four universal strategies for the implementation of organizational changes, and explains the approach and implications of the ‘seven aspects of implementation’: • Results (what do we want to achieve?)
• Planning and control (how will we get it done?)
• Design and order (how do we arrange it?)
• Communication (how do we involve everyone?)
• Training (how do we learn to deal with it?)
• Anchoring and improvement (how will we keep it working?)
• Wrap-up and evaluation (what has it brought?)

I will not go in-depth on these aspects, but will leave you with the knowledge that for each implementation strategy the balance and interaction between these aspects is slightly different, and matches a certain type of change. Below, I will present a brief explanation of the four strategies.

Executive strategy
Focus on: Doing.
When: The goals are clear and acceptable for everyone involved, and the change process is obvious.
Points of attention: Clear and tight planning, alignment between project group and departments, clear communication on successes as well as setbacks. Example: The introduction of a new product in an experienced organization.

Participation strategy
Focus on: Competences and attitude.
When: Goals are not challenging, but not supported by everyone.
Points of attention: Create commitment, don’t rush it, start a training programme, convince people of what’s in it for them, create quick wins.
Example: Introduction of a quality control system.

Design strategy
Focus on: Co-creating the content.
When: Goals are vague, everyone knows something has to be done, although nobody knows exactly what.
Points of attention: Working together, frequent measurements and redirection where needed, active participation of line management, a clear ending to the change process to prevent the discussion from going on forever.
Example: Expansion of a physical business to include online activities.

Growth strategy
Focus on: Gradual change and inspiring.
When: Complex changes, goals are not clear at the start, and the change is hard to realise due to the necessary technology or design.
Points of attention: Divide the process into small parts that are developed consecutively, see what it brings and if it works, before continuing to the next part. Lots of dialogue, careful communication and inspiring leadership are needed. All stakeholders should be involved in determining shared goals.
Example: Mergers.

Discussion
Pater et al. have developed a nice guide for change implementation in all sorts of organizations. They have made some progress in the development of change management theory, and the book can prove quite valuable for managers in more traditional organizations. However, imagineering is already far ahead of this. The first two strategies can still be considered top-down change management as discussed in my introduction, only with a bit more attention for the social side of business. The last two strategies are closer to Imagineering theory, but there are still some significant differences. The ‘design’ strategy is about designing a strategy and organizing the organization together with line management, and in the growth strategy even more stakeholders are involved. This is a little bit like Appreciative Inquiry theory, used in Imagineering. However, perhaps the most important stakeholder in Imagineering theory is the customer, who has no say at all in any of the strategies by Pater et al. All strategic innovation is based on the input of stakeholders inside the organization, while co-creation in Imagineering especially refers to the active participation of the customer. In the traditional understanding of implementation, the way strategy was designed was not relevant, since implementation started afterwards. By stressing the definition of implementation to include the design of strategy, however, Pater et al. commit themselves to include it in their book. By stating that “It is necessary to ensure that the project does not yield something that does not meet the expectations of the line organization”, Pater et al. show that their vision is still too much like the traditional meaning of implementation.
Another aspect in which Imagineering is ahead of the theory presented in this book, is the duration of the process. Imagineering is about making an organization more creative, transparent and communicative as a whole. Creative processes and dialogue should continue and organizational strategy itself should be innovative. Pater et al., however, state that the change process should have a distinct and absolute end, to prevent endless discussions. And exactly this continuing dialogue with staff and consumers is what is so important today.

Niels van der Haven

LOVEMARKS – Kevin Roberts

What do Amazon, Apple, The Body Shop, Coca-Cola, Disney, Google, Harley-Davidson, Levi’s, Nelson Mandela, Nike, Pampers, Red Cross, Toyota and Virgin have in common?

Yes they are popular brands, but they are so much more than that. According to Kevin Roberts (2006) from Saatchi & Saatchi, these brands are Lovemarks. He writes: “Businesses have always assumed that people see the brands the same way they do. This is why they can get it SO-O-O-O wrong. But some special brands don’t seem to make that mistake. They are so far out in front that they seem to have evolved into something else. They are what inspired Saatchi & Saatchi to develop Lovemarks as the future beyond brands.”

To test whether a brand belongs amongst the Lovemarks, the ‘Love/Respect Axis’ has been created. Products such as sand and iron, that are not desired by people are commodities and are low on love and respect.

Products that are low on respect but high on love are ‘fads’, also known as ‘cool right now’, but can be replaced at any time. Roberts mentions Hula Hoops and ‘Survivor’ as fad examples.

When products have earned high respect but little emotion or love is involved, they are ranked as ‘brands’. Competition is tough.
Lovemarks, on the other hand, are high on respect and on love. This table demonstrates the difference between ordinary brands and Lovemarks.

“Lovemarks are not owned by the manufacturers, the producers, the businesses. They are owned by the people who love them.”

“Lovemarks are personal. And they can be anything – a person, a country, a car, an organization. Lovemarks are the charismatic brands that people love and fiercely protect. You know them instantly.”

On my personal Lovemark list you can find Louis Vuitton; the always fashionable and everlasting bag with its unmistakable monogram pattern; the Middle East with its mysterious but colourful culture; and my family (of course) for being the greatest support and source of inspiration.

Try making your own list of Lovemarks. They should match up to the following statements:

- Lovemarks connect companies, their people and their brands
- Lovemarks inspire. Loyalty beyond reason
- Lovemarks are owned by the people who love them
The book is not only beautiful and fun to read/ scan/ flip through: the message Roberts conveys is very relevant to Imagineering. He says: “As the mass market geared up, businesses lost their way. They became detached from personal relationships,” meaning that businesses should practice customer intimacy at a far deeper level. This not only means that they get to know their customer better, but rather show a genuine interest in their desires, and then cater to those needs and wants.

“The deciding factor is about what the consumer needs in his or her life.”
Saatchi & Saatchi are a world renowned advertising agency, so one could argue that they are masters in selling products. They are. What makes them so good at it is their hunger for understanding the customer, or rather ‘guest’. Just like Imagineers, they value stories a tremendous deal, and the employees of Saatchi & Saatchi have become skilled listeners.

“Stories have a huge value in business because they look in the right direction. At people. You cannot tell a story without characters and emotion and sensory detail. Even the dumbest road-crossing-chicken jokes have it. And they capture us faster than the most elaborately produced annual report. A picture may be worth a thousand words, but terrific stories are right up there with them.”

Lovemarks is a valuable display of how a design approach can be optimalised for co-creation. Nothing Saatchi & Saatchi does is without the co-operation and consent of the customer and should bring mutual benefits. Their research goes further than questionnaires and even interviews. Saatchi & Saatchi employees are encouraged to go out and spend time or even live with the ‘customers’ to gain a deeper understanding and therefore build a more effective advertising campaign and eventually a Lovemark. This even goes beyond Imagineering research methods and resembles anthropological research.

“If you want to catch a fish, first learn to think like a fish.”

For everyone who enjoys looking at stunning graphics, likes diversity, and is looking for a great example of a truly customer oriented company, I would recommend Lovemarks in a heartbeat. The book can be read in one breath, but can also be left on the coffee table for the occasional impressive flip-through. The book is easy to read, but often requires you to flip the book 180 degrees, lift inserts or even play the CD-ROM that is included. Roberts even gives the reader advice on ‘things to do’ at the end of each chapter. Though mainly directed towards managers, the book is easily comprehendible, and captures the essence of Imagineering. Even though Lovemarks is hardly related to my thesis topic concerning Veteran care, it does show how even organisations as the Red Cross can obtain iconic status through the people that spread the word on the organisation’s good deeds. On the Lovemarks website: http://www.lovemarks.com/ you can find testimonials on the Red Cross by people from all over the world, alongside a list of all Lovemarks, video’s, links, communities to join and learn from, user polls and much more.

List of references:

Roberts, K. 2006. Lovemarks. The Future Beyond Brands. Saatchi & Saatchi Designer Edition, Brooklyn, NY, Powerhouse Books
http://www.saatchikevin.com/Downloads/ book review Lovemarks in PDF